Current:Home > MyCalifornia considers unique safety regulations for AI companies, but faces tech firm opposition -WealthStream
California considers unique safety regulations for AI companies, but faces tech firm opposition
View
Date:2025-04-12 03:51:02
SACRAMENTO, Calif. (AP) — California lawmakers are considering legislation that would require artificial intelligence companies to test their systems and add safety measures so they can’t be potentially manipulated to wipe out the state’s electric grid or help build chemical weapons — scenarios that experts say could be possible in the future as technology evolves at warp speed.
Legislators plan to vote Tuesday on this first-of-its-kind bill, which aims to reduce risks created by AI. It is fiercely opposed by tech companies, including Meta, the parent company of Facebook and Instagram, and Google. They say the regulations take aim at developers and instead should be focused on those who use and exploit the AI systems for harm.
Democratic state Sen. Scott Wiener, who authors the bill, said the proposal would provide reasonable safety standards by preventing “catastrophic harms” from extremely powerful AI models that may be created in the future. The requirements would only apply to systems that cost more than $100 million in computing power to train. No current AI models have hit that threshold as of July.
“This is not about smaller AI models,” Wiener said at a recent legislative hearing. “This is about incredibly large and powerful models that, as far as we know, do not exist today but will exist in the near future.”
Democratic Gov. Gavin Newsom has touted California as an early AI adopter and regulator, saying the state could soon deploy generative AI tools to address highway congestion, make roads safer and provide tax guidance. At the same time, his administration is considering new rules against AI discrimination in hiring practices. He declined to comment on the bill but has warned that overregulation could put the state in a “perilous position.”
The proposal, supported by some of the most renowned AI researchers, would also create a new state agency to oversee developers and provide best practices. The state attorney general also would be able to pursue legal actions in case of violations.
A growing coalition of tech companies argue the requirements would discourage companies from developing large AI systems or keeping their technology open-source.
“The bill will make the AI ecosystem less safe, jeopardize open-source models relied on by startups and small businesses, rely on standards that do not exist, and introduce regulatory fragmentation,” Rob Sherman, Meta vice president and deputy chief privacy officer, wrote in a letter sent to lawmakers.
The proposal could also drive companies out of state to avoid the regulations, the state’s Chamber of Commerce said.
Opponents want to wait for more guidance from the federal government. Proponents of the bill said California cannot wait, citing hard lessons they learned not acting soon enough to reign in social media companies.
State lawmakers were also considering Tuesday another ambitious measure to fight automation discrimination when companies use AI models to screen job resumes and rental apartment applications.
veryGood! (1)
Related
- Finally, good retirement news! Southwest pilots' plan is a bright spot, experts say
- Infant dies after pregnant bystander struck in shooting at intersection: Officials
- A man charged with voter fraud in Florida blames rivalry between Trump and DeSantis supporters
- Elite pilots prepare for ‘camping out in the sky’ as they compete in prestigious gas balloon race
- B.A. Parker is learning the banjo
- California county sues utility alleging equipment sparked wildfires
- Cop allegedly punched man 13 times after argument over masks
- The flight attendants of CHAOS
- South Korea's acting president moves to reassure allies, calm markets after Yoon impeachment
- New York Giants OL Evan Neal shoos 'fair-weather' fans: 'A lot of fans are bandwagoners'
Ranking
- A Mississippi company is sentenced for mislabeling cheap seafood as premium local fish
- Victoria Beckham Shares Why She Was “Pissed Off” With David Beckham Over Son Cruz’s Birth
- Infant dies after pregnant bystander struck in shooting at intersection: Officials
- Dear Life Kit: Your most petty social dilemmas, answered
- Questlove charts 50 years of SNL musical hits (and misses)
- Grimes files petition against Elon Musk to 'establish parental relationship' of their kids
- Nearly 80% of Italians say they are Catholic. But few regularly go to church
- Israel is perennially swept up in religious conflict. Yet many of its citizens are secular
Recommendation
A Mississippi company is sentenced for mislabeling cheap seafood as premium local fish
U.N. approves sending international force to Haiti to help quell gang violence
'Tennessee Three' lawmaker Justin Jones sues state House Speaker over expulsion, vote to silence him
'It's personal': Lauren Holiday 'crushed' leaving Milwaukee after Bucks trade Jrue Holiday
Pressure on a veteran and senator shows what’s next for those who oppose Trump
Who is Patrick McHenry, the new speaker pro tempore?
Drug dealer sentenced to 30 years in overdose deaths of 3 New Yorkers
Morgan State University mass shooting: 5 shot on campus, search for suspect ongoing